Q3 2023 Putnam Municipal Bond Funds Q&A
- Interest-rate volatility and cautious sentiment weighed on municipal bonds.
- We targeted a modestly long-duration position in the portfolios relative to the funds’ Lipper peer groups.
- We believe security selection and sector exposure decisions matter, especially if the U.S. economy slows.
How did municipal bonds perform during the third quarter of 2023?
The asset class began the quarter positively, with recession fears easing and many investors embracing a soft-landing narrative for the U.S. economy. Better-than-expected economic data also contributed to the rally. In August, municipal bonds, along with other interest-rate-sensitive bonds, sold off. The credit-rating agency Fitch Ratings downgraded the U.S. government’s credit rating from AAA to AA+. Municipal bond yields rose, moving in sync with U.S. Treasury yields. This weighed on the asset class, as municipal bond prices move inversely to yields. Markets continued to experience weakness in September, as concerns mounted about U.S. monetary policy, rising U.S. Treasury yields, surging oil prices, and weaker consumer demand.
Combatting inflation remained a top priority for the Federal Reserve. At the end of July, the Fed raised rates by 0.25%, which brought the federal funds rate to 5.25%–5.50%. This was the highest range in 22 years. At its annual conference in August, the Fed stated it would “proceed carefully” and continue making data-driven decisions on a meeting-to-meeting basis. As part of this process, the Fed mentioned it would try to balance the risk of doing too much and slowing growth against the risk of doing too little and reigniting inflation.
The Fed left its benchmark rate unchanged at the September meeting, but its commentary took on a more hawkish tone. The Fed suggested another interest-rate hike was possible before the end of 2023. Policymakers also indicated the need to keep interest rates high well into 2024 to ensure inflation drops back down to its 2% target rate and that, when rates eventually come down, it may happen more slowly than previously projected. Yields on U.S. Treasuries rose, and prices fell further, as investors ratcheted up their expectations for the Fed’s terminal interest rate. This amplified recession concerns and weighed on interest-rate-sensitive investments from bonds to high-growth technology stocks.
For the three months ended September 30, 2023, the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index returned –3.95%. Short-term municipal bonds outperformed their intermediate- and long-term cohorts. From a credit perspective, investment-grade bonds outperformed high-yield bonds during the quarter, which aided performance due to our preference for higher-quality bonds.
What was your strategy during the third quarter?
We closely monitored our credit positioning throughout the quarter. We remained somewhat cautious on lower-rated cohorts and are currently not adding significantly to high yield due to the uncertainty surrounding slowing U.S. economic growth. Regarding positioning, the funds had an overweight exposure to both the lower tiers of the investment-grade universe [A and BBB] and the highest-rated portions of the high-yield universe compared with their Lipper peer groups.
Given the shape of the municipal bond curve, we favored bonds at the longer end of the curve for our long-term portfolios. For short- and intermediate-term portfolios, the funds had a barbell strategy. This meant holding more bonds in the very front end of the yield curve and in the longer-intermediate portion of the yield curve.
We targeted a modestly long-duration position in the portfolios relative to the funds’ Lipper peer groups. [Duration is a measure of a fund’s interest-rate sensitivity.] The funds were invested in a wide range of sectors, including retirement community, private higher education, housing-backed, essential service utilities, and state-backed bonds.
We continue to find opportunities across the municipal bond market, uncovering value in rating, sector, and coupon dislocations.
What is your current assessment of the health of the municipal bond market?
Municipal credit fundamentals remain stable, in our view. Higher employment and increasing wages have bolstered tax receipts in the past few years. We continue to monitor the housing market, including home values, an important factor in property tax revenues.
Total state and local tax collections fell 7.0% in the first half of 2023 compared with the first half of 2022. At the same time, total tax revenues are nearly 16% above their five-year average. Also, state and local governments’ rainy-day funds and financial reserves are close to 30-year highs. Municipal defaults through September are down 28% versus the average of the past five years and continue to represent a very small percentage of the market. As such, we believe the credit outlook remains favorable, though we continue to actively evaluate credit conditions.
In the second half of 2023, we expect economic growth to continue to slow as the economy responds to the past 18 months of higher, Fed-driven, short-term interest rates.
What do you see on the horizon that could influence your management of the funds?
Interest-rate volatility, a hawkish Fed, and inflationary pressures could remain headwinds for rate-sensitive investments in the near term, in our view. Following the market’s reaction to the Fed’s summary of economic projections and dot plot from its September meeting, 10-year U.S. Treasury yields reached their highest levels since October 2007. Given how resilient U.S. growth has been, we believe the Fed may need to keep interest rates higher for longer to allow the effects of its policy to trickle through the economy.
We regard any market volatility as an investment opportunity and continue to be vigilant for dips in the market that can present attractive entry points. Current valuations are attractive, in our view. At the close of quarter-end, taxable equivalent yields were close to 7.00%, suggesting municipal bonds were relatively cheap on a long-term basis.
Fundamentals across most municipal sectors remain stable, in our view. Generally speaking, defaults remain low and are contained to the non-rated subsectors. That said, we believe security selection and sector exposure decisions matter, especially if the U.S. economy slows.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.
