- Research shows that gender diversity on corporate boards is associated with higher financial returns.
- Our portfolios own more companies with a greater percentage of women board members than the average of the S&P 500.
- Teams with diverse perspectives and experiences have stronger decision-making ability.
Diversity in companies — including gender diversity — can have a positive impact on company performance and strategic ability. It’s a key metric that we use when we consider corporate governance in companies we research.
We invest with the philosophy that companies that address key sustainability issues, including gender diversity, have demonstrated the capacity to add value over the long term. Companies that address diversity and gender equity may also improve corporate culture, management capacity, and value to shareholders over time.
Women add value on boards
Numerous studies of gender diversity have shown that diverse boards are associated with higher financial returns, higher firm value, higher profitability, increased investment in research and development, and lower volatility.*
We have seen an increasing recognition of the value of diversity in our research, with progress toward gender equity. The average board of the S&P 500, for example, saw representation among women rise to 25% in 2019 from 14% in 2008.†
Gender diversity is also an important part of many of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs are a set of global priorities — a call to action — developed by countries, NGOs (non-governmental organizations), businesses, and stakeholders around the world. The goals serve as a guide for the long-term sustainability efforts of companies and investors, and as a mandate to address challenges facing the world.
For a deeper look at the importance of these metrics, see our 2020 “Sustainability and impact report.”
What does the data reveal?
In our research, we investigate the growing trend of women serving on corporate boards.
While most of the boards of companies in which we invest are still far from achieving gender parity, gender diversity is increasing. At the end of 2019, holdings in the Sustainable Leaders Fund had a weighted average of 31% female representation, and holdings in the Sustainable Future Fund had a weighted average of 29%. Both measures have steadily risen over the past two years, and both are higher than the board composition of their respective benchmarks. The averages for the Russell Midcap Growth Index are significantly lower than those of the S&P 500, indicating a general trend of better gender parity on the boards of larger companies.
Our portfolios also have a higher-than-market representation of companies where women comprise 30% or more of total board membership. This level is important because, around the 30% mark, the inputs a woman might give shift from being perceived as “a woman’s point of view” to “a different point of view.”‡ In short, this level of participation allows women’s inputs to be more fully incorporated into corporate governance.
Percentage of portfolio/index companies with women comprising at least 30% of board
Source: Data from MSCI ESG Research LLC, as of 12/31/19. Calculations by Putnam.
This measure also improved for both of our portfolios in the past year, with nearly half of corporate boards passing the 30% threshold. Of broader importance for society, there was meaningful progress among benchmark companies over the same time period.
Despite these improvements, S&P 500 boards continue to be imbalanced, with almost 5,500 men serving as members compared with just 1,500 women. Progress to date is notable, yet clearly more work is ahead to achieve gender parity.
Diversity as a problem-solving advantage
Our research process extends beyond the specific metric of women membership on corporate boards. We focus on understanding how companies prioritize diversity in all forms and at all levels of the organization. Teams with diverse perspectives and experiences have stronger decision-making ability, particularly when facing dynamic and complex problems.
We also examine a board’s accountability to stakeholders and transparency. All of these areas have meaningful implications for understanding long-term governance.
The association between diverse boards and strong financial outcomes highlights the potential benefits of investing in diversity. It serves as a starting point for incorporating a more complete assessment of the composition of all company teams — beyond the boardroom.
Board diversity is one example of the areas we research as we aim to assess the impact of material environmental, social, and governance issues on the health of companies.
Now more than ever, we believe that sustainable companies could prove to be more resilient than other companies over the long term.
*Source: “Board Diversity, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies,” February 2016 (http://english.ckgsb.edu.cn/sites/default/files/files/Board%20Diversity_20160201.pdf).
†Source: McKinsey, “Women Matter: Time to accelerate,” October 2017, for 2008 data, and Putnam for 2019 calculation (https://www.wcwonline.org/pdf/CriticalMassExecSummary.pdf)
‡Source: “Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why three or more women enhance governance,” V. Kramer & Associates, University of Western Ontario, Wellesley Centers for Women, 2006. (https://www.wcwonline.org/pdf/CriticalMassExecSummary.pdf); most recent available
The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.
The Russell Midcap Growth Index is an unmanaged index of those companies in the Russell Midcap Index chosen for their growth orientation.
Frank Russell Company is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks, and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is a trademark of Frank Russell Company.
You cannot invest directly in an index.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.