Q4 2020 Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Q&A
- Bank loans rose about 4% in the fourth quarter, aided by demand for higher-yielding securities.
- Overweight allocations in housing and broadcasting contributed the most versus the benchmark. Conversely, adverse positioning in technology and services, along with security selection in financials, detracted.
- We have a moderately constructive intermediate-term view on the market's fundamental environment and supply-and-demand backdrop.
How did the fund perform for the three months ended December 31, 2020?The fund's class Y shares returned 3.10%, trailing the 3.81% result of the benchmark S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan In-dex.
What was the fund's investment environment like during the fourth quarter of 2020?The quarter began on a positive note, as hopes for a COVID-19 vaccine and additional fiscal stimulus led to a modest gain in October.
The high-yield loan market rallied strongly in November, gaining about 2% for the month. Encouraging vaccine news bolstered investor optimism about the strength of the economic recovery in 2021. The U.S. election outcome — a Biden victory and what appeared at the time would be a divided Congress — also boosted market sentiment. The asset class continued to rally in December amid increasing positivity about economic growth in the New Year.
Reflecting renewed investor demand for risk, bank loans outpaced investment-grade corporate bonds and the broad investment-grade fixed-income market for the quarter overall. Loans trailed high-yield bonds.
Within the S&P/LSTA index, all cohorts posted gains, led by transportation, energy, and broadcasting, each of which gained about 6%. In contrast, the more-defensive utilities and paper & packaging groups were the weakest performers versus the index, with each returning about 2%.
From a credit-rating perspective, lower-quality loans generated the highest gains, signaling increased risk appetite on the part of investors and demand for higher yields.
What factors had the biggest influence on the fund's relative performance?On the plus side, overweight allocations in housing and broadcasting added the most value versus the benchmark. Conversely, adverse positioning in technology and services, along with security selection in financials, detracted from relative performance.
What is your outlook for the bank loan market over the coming months?As we move into 2021, we have a moderately constructive view overall. Although we expect the ongoing global health crisis to affect the high-yield loan market, we have a fairly positive intermediate-term outlook for corporate fundamentals and the market's supply-and-demand backdrop. Also, even though loan spreads retightened following their sizable widening in March, we think valuations remain relatively attractive. [Spreads are the yield advantage high-yield loans offer over comparable-maturity U.S. Treasuries.]
From a fundamental perspective, we are closely watching sectors vulnerable to the disruption caused by the pandemic. We are monitoring the impact on energy, gaming, lodging & leisure, retail, and several other cohorts. Within these groups, we are focusing on the health of issuers' balance sheets and liquidity metrics, as well as the risk of defaults or credit-rating downgrades.
As for supply/demand dynamics, net new issuance of loans [net of issuance for refinancing purposes] totaled $192.7 billion, slightly above net issuance of $192.2 billion in 2019. On the demand side, loan funds [mutual funds and exchange-traded funds] saw outflows of $26.9 billion in 2020. However, loan funds reported an inflow of $521 million in December 2020, the first inflow since September 2018.
Collateralized loan obligations [CLOs] remained a comparative bright spot for loan demand, despite lower year-over-year volume. [CLOs bundle corporate loans and sell slices of the debt to institutional investors.] For 2020, CLO volume totaled $125.1 billion compared with $161.2 billion in 2019. CLOs now account for roughly two-thirds of the total assets in the loan market, while retail funds represent only about 10%. As a result, despite fund outflows, we think the market's technical environment is neutral to favorable. Steady net new loan issuance is being met by relatively consistent CLO demand.
From a valuation standpoint, the average spread of the fund's benchmark tightened to about 4.9 percentage points over U.S. Treasuries as of period-end, below the long-term average of six percentage points. After tightening from March's extremely wide level, loan spreads compressed further on recent vaccine news. The benchmark's yield was at 5.10% as of December 31, its lowest level since mid-2014. Optimism over continued government stimulus and vaccine distribution drove loan prices higher and yields lower. Despite tighter spreads and lower yields, we think the market's yield and overall total return potential remain attractive in the face of much lower global yields.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.