Q2 2021 Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Q&A
- High-yield bank loans posted a modest gain in the second quarter, aided by demand for higher-yielding securities and overall economic optimism.
- Security selection and underweight allocations in the technology and services sectors, along with picks in financials, detracted from relative performance this quarter.
- We have a generally positive outlook for the loan market's fundamental environment and supply-and-demand backdrop, but are more neutral toward valuation.
How did the fund perform for the three months ended June 30, 2021?The fund's class Y shares rose 1.16%, trailing the 1.47% return of the benchmark S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index.
What was the fund's investment environment like during the second quarter of 2021?High-yield bank loans rallied in April amid favorable sentiment toward risk assets, ongoing fund inflows, and CLO origination occurring at a record pace. [CLO stands for "collateralized loan obligation." These vehicles bundle corporate loans and sell slices of the debt to institutional investors.]
Leveraged loans outperformed their fixed-rate peers in May, as investors weighed advancing Covid-19 vaccination campaigns, accelerating economic growth, and strong earnings against a rise in inflation. Following the announcement of the highest Consumer Price Index reading since 1982, some U.S. Federal Reserve governors indicated openness to discussing when the Fed should begin reducing its bond purchase program. These developments led to brief periods of volatility for interest rates and stocks, while loan prices proved relatively resilient.
The asset class posted another modest gain in June but lagged its fixed-rate peers amid receding inflation concerns and heavy capital market activity. That said, there was no indication of slowing demand for floating-rate loans.
Relative to other asset classes, loans trailed high-yield bonds and the broad investment-grade fixed-income market this quarter.
Within the fund's benchmark, every cohort generated a positive result with returns in a fairly tight range. Energy [+3%] was the best-performing group, powered by a 24% advance in the price of U.S. crude oil. Other outperformers included transportation; gaming, lodging & leisure; and services, each of which gained about 2%. Utilities [+0.3%] and broadcasting [+0.1%] were the weakest performers. From a credit-rating perspective, lower-quality loans outperformed the benchmark, signaling a comfort level with risk as investors sought higher yields.
What factors had the biggest influence on the fund's relative performance?Security selection and underweight allocations in the technology and services sectors, along with picks in financials, hampered performance versus the benchmark.
What is the team's outlook for the bank loan market over the coming months?We have a positive outlook for loan market fundamentals and the overall supply-and-demand backdrop. Our view on valuation is more neutral, given the relative tightness of yield spreads in the market as of quarter-end. Our optimism is grounded in the rapidly growing percentage of Americans receiving Covid-19 vaccines, sustained government stimulus, and the continuing recovery of the U.S. economy. That said, we continue to closely monitor issuers' balance sheets and liquidity metrics, with an eye toward default risk or a credit-rating downgrade. Risks to our generally constructive outlook include any new developments with Covid-19, volatility in commodity prices, and policy missteps from global central banks.
Expectations for defaults have meaningfully improved this year, given the liquidity in the market. Many troubled issuers have been given the lifeline they need to continue operating. Including distressed exchanges, the U.S. leveraged loan default rate ended the quarter at 1.43%, down substantially from 3.15% at the end of last June. The departure of large default/distressed totals from June 2020 helped lower the rolling 12-month default rate calculation.
As for supply/demand dynamics, new issuance of loans totaled $494.9 billion on a year-to-date basis through June 2021, more than double the amount issued during the same period last year. About 62% of this year's new issuance has been used to refinance existing debt. On the demand side, loan funds [mutual funds and exchange-traded funds] posted inflows of $26.8 billion for the second quarter compared with outflows of $22.1 billion during the same period in 2020.
CLOs continued to be a major source of loan demand this period. In June, gross CLO volume reached the second-highest monthly total ever recorded. Year to date through June 30, CLO volume equaled $215 billion, compared with $59.8 billion in the first half of 2020.
CLOs now account for roughly two thirds of the total assets in the loan market, while retail funds represent only about 10%. As a result, despite a substantial increase in loan supply, we think the market's technical environment is favorable. Stronger demand from both retail investors and CLOs is meeting higher net new loan issuance.
From a valuation standpoint, the average yield spread of the fund's benchmark tightened to 4.2 percentage points over 10-year U.S. Treasuries as of quarter-end, below the long-term average of 6 percentage points. The benchmark's yield was 4.76% as of June 30, significantly below its 11-year average of 7.29%. Optimism over government stimulus and vaccine distribution continued to drive loan prices higher and yields lower this quarter. Despite tighter spreads and lower yields, we think the market's income potential remains attractive in the face of much lower global yields.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.