Q4 2021 Putnam Global Income Trust Q&A
- Bonds carrying greater credit risk outpaced higher-quality bonds for the quarter, while U.S. securities generally topped their non-U.S. counterparts.
- The fund’s interest-rate and yield-curve strategy detracted from relative performance.
- Entering 2022, we will continue to closely monitor coronavirus-related developments, as well as U.S. Federal Reserve policy moves.
How did the fund perform for the three months ended December 31, 2021?The fund’s class Y shares returned –1.42%, trailing the –0.67% result of the benchmark Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index.
What was the market environment like during the fourth quarter of 2021?Fixed-income securities posted subdued returns during the final three months of the year. Bonds carrying greater credit risk fared somewhat better than their higher-quality, investment-grade counterparts. High-yield corporate credit rallied in December as concerns about the severity of the Omicron coronavirus variant receded. Strong stock market gains also bolstered the overall risk backdrop in December. U.S. securities generally outperformed international stocks and bonds, in U.S.-dollar terms.
In November, the U.S. Federal Reserve began winding down its $120 billion-per-month bond-purchase program by $15 billion per month. In December, the Fed announced it would accelerate the pace to $30 billion per month, which could phase out purchases entirely by March 2022. Signaling the Fed’s view that inflationary pressures are likely to broaden, both the central bank and investors now anticipate three 0.25% increases in the federal funds rate during 2022.
Against this backdrop, the U.S. Treasury yield curve flattened during the quarter. The yield on the 2-year U.S. Treasury note jumped to its highest level since March 2020, reflecting investor reaction to the Fed’s hawkish pivot. Meanwhile, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note remained flat while longer-term yields declined.
Which holdings and strategies hampered the fund’s performance versus the benchmark?Our interest-rate and yield-curve strategy was the largest relative detractor. The portfolio was positioned to benefit if inflation declined and real interest rates rose. [Real interest rates adjust for the effects of inflation by subtracting the actual or expected rate of inflation from nominal interest rates.] Real rates rose moderately during the quarter but not enough to aid our positioning.
Our interest-rate and yield-curve strategy is intended to provide a degree of protection against underperformance of risk-based assets. Now that the Fed has begun to tighten monetary policy, we believe real interest rates will rise during 2022, which may boost our strategy.
Strategies targeting prepayment risk also dampened the fund’s relative results. Yield spreads on our agency interest-only collateralized mortgage obligations [IO CMOs] widened during the quarter due to broader market volatility. [Spreads are the yield advantage credit-sensitive bonds offer over comparable-maturity U.S. Treasuries. Bond prices rise as yield spreads tighten and decline as spreads widen.] On a positive note, prepayment speeds on the mortgages underlying our holdings slowed as mortgage rates rose modestly and refinancing activity decelerated. IO CMOs and other mortgage-backed securities benefit when homeowners refinance or pay off their mortgages at a slower rate than investors anticipate.
What about relative contributors?Our active currency strategy added the most value on a relative basis, fueled by favorable positioning in the euro, the British pound, and the Japanese yen. Investors flocked to these and other safe-haven currencies amid the heightened volatility sparked by the Omicron variant. Mortgage credit holdings also notably contributed versus the benchmark, led by our exposure to commercial mortgage-backed securities [CMBS]. Lower volatility, strong demand from investors, and better overall fundamentals boosted the sector following significant volatility during 2020.
An allocation to investment-grade corporate bonds was a modest relative contributor, driven by favorable security selection.
What is the team's near-term outlook?The economic environment of 2021 drove strong returns across credit markets, fueled by optimism around economic reopening and ample fiscal and monetary stimulus. But this environment also created inflation that exceeds the Fed’s target and has proven more persistent than originally expected. We will likely see declining support from central banks in 2022 as the Fed and its global peers pivot away from accommodative policy to rein in inflation. This hawkish turn in Fed policy, coupled with potential improvement in supply chain issues, could mean a reduction in core inflation by 2022’s second quarter.
What are your current views on the various sectors in which the fund invests?Looking first at corporate credit, we have a positive outlook for the fundamentals and overall supply-and-demand backdrop of high-yield bonds. Our view on valuation is more neutral, however, given the relative tightness of yield spreads as of quarter-end. Within the high-yield market, we are continuing to closely monitor issuers’ balance sheets and liquidity metrics, with an eye toward default risk or a credit-rating downgrade.
In the CMBS market, we believe there are attractive risk-adjusted investment opportunities available amid an improving fundamental backdrop. By virtue of having real assets serving as collateral, along with the potential for rent adjustments, CMBS have historically performed well during periods of rising inflation. As a result, we believe CMBS may offer attractive relative value to a wide range of investors.
Within residential mortgage credit, we believe a combination of low mortgage rates, high demand, and a declining inventory of available homes is likely to push home prices higher. Given that prices have already risen substantially, we are aware that affordability has become a constraint for many prospective buyers. Consequently, we think the pace of home price appreciation is likely to moderate during 2022. Against this backdrop, we are finding value in investment-grade securities backed by non-agency residential loans, even with tighter yield spreads.
The environment for prepayment-related strategies was challenging in 2021. Despite this, we still have conviction in this allocation for its return potential and diversification benefits. Mortgage interest rates have risen modestly since bottoming in early August. With the Fed pivoting to a less accommodative policy stance, we believe mortgage rates may continue to rise in 2022. Consequently, we think refinancing activity will recede and mortgage prepayment speeds will slow. In our view, IO CMOs may offer particularly compelling potential against this backdrop. Moreover, we believe prepayment-sensitive securities in general may offer attractive returns from current price levels if prepayment speeds remain at their current pace for the foreseeable future.
In emerging markets, we are seeking opportunities in countries that we think are better positioned to benefit from a global recovery and are less exposed to domestic policy risks.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.