According to the latest Trustees report, the Social Security trust funds are projected to be depleted in 2035. This is one year later than last year’s projection. Still, Social Security’s total cost is projected to exceed its total income in 2020 for the first time since 1982. That situation prompted significant reform of the Social Security system by Congress in 1983.
If no modifications to the program are made and current trends continue, reserves will be depleted in 2035. Benefits would still be paid but would likely be reduced to roughly 75% of the former benefit amount. In essence, recipients would receive a cut of roughly 25% in retirement income.
Costs of the program as a percentage of GDP will increase substantially through 2035 because the number of beneficiaries rise rapidly as baby boomers retire. Also, persistent lower birth rates have resulted in slower growth of employment and GDP.
What did government do in 1983?
The last time Social Security saw any major reform was more than three decades ago. To strengthen the program, Congress took several steps including raised the retirement age over time from age 65 to 67, increasing payroll taxes, and taxing a portion of Social Security benefits (based on income). Congress also instituted the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO), which limit benefits for retirees who were covered under another pension system and did not pay into Social Security. For more details on the WEP and and GPO, read this SSA article.
Potential modifications to Social Security
Several changes to Social Security that have been proposed or discussed by policy makers in recent years.
Some examples include:
- Alter the consumer price index (CPI) formula for cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) and change the calculation to “chained CPI,” which would result in a lower COLA adjustment, as compared with the current CPI formula.
- Increase the wage base for payroll tax contributions. Currently the base is $132,900, which covers 83% of total wages in the United States. The last time Social Security was reformed, this amount represented 90% of wages. If this calculation were updated to 90% of today’s wages, the base would increase to about $245,000 (Congressional Budget Office, December 2016).
- Gradually raise the retirement age. The age has already increased to 67 for those born in the 1960s and beyond.
- Increase the payroll tax rate (currently 6.2% up to $130,900).
- Institute means testing. This action would reduce benefits for those reporting at higher income levels.
Many retirees will depend on Social Security for at least a portion of their retirement income. According to the Social Security Administration, 21% of married couples and 44% of single individuals will rely on Social Security benefits for 90% or more of their retirement income.
In a 2015 poll, 36% of those approaching retirement indicated they expect Social Security to be a source of retirement income.
There are planning strategies that workers may consider to prepare for potential cuts to Social Security. Younger workers, in particular, may be affected by cuts due to solvency issues or policy changes. Investors could consider increasing current retirement savings rates to deal with a potential shortfall. Another strategy is to diversify retirement savings to hedge against the risk of rising tax rates. Consider allocating retirement assets into a Roth IRA as well as some pretax accounts. Lastly, since Social Security is often the only source of guaranteed income for today’s retirees, these investors may want to consider utilizing a portion of their retirement savings to purchase a guaranteed income product.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This information is not meant as tax or legal advice. Please consult with the appropriate tax or legal professional regarding your particular circumstances before making any investment decisions. Putnam does not provide tax or legal advice.