With investors around the world trying to gauge the timing of U.S. interest-rate increases, Fed Chair Janet Yellen in her March press conference did a masterful job of creating maximum flexibility for the central bank. It was no small accomplishment, after she had painted the Fed into a corner during previous communications by giving clues as to what would trigger a rate increase. After following this trail of breadcrumbs, pundits had focused the debate on whether the liftoff would come at the June or September Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting.
We now think there is a possibility that the Fed could move at just about any time, including between meetings. Credit Yellen’s ability to give enough to both bulls and bears to leave both sides convinced of their arguments. She even stated that removal of the term “patient” from the Fed statement did not mean that the Open Market Committee had become impatient. She also continued to reinforce the idea that the Fed was watching a constellation of data related to both labor markets and inflation. Markets interpreted the Fed’s shift in posture to be dovish, with stocks rising and bond yields falling initially following the Fed meeting.
From our perspective, we think the economy will be strong enough to warrant a rate hike in June. While there was some softness in first-quarter economic data — a number of reports came in shy of consensus expectations — we regard this as likely the result of another severe winter that temporarily delayed some spending. In addition, U.S. West Coast ports experienced a significant slowdown due to labor issues that have now been resolved. We expect to see data bounce back in the second quarter after a difficult winter, much as it did in 2014, and prompt the Fed to consider acting should they view disinflation as less of a threat and should the advance in the U.S. dollar pause.
The Fed ought to be eager to move the policy rate off the zero bound, if only by a token amount, for two reasons. First, a zero-interest-rate policy (ZIRP) is often regarded as an emergency measure to counter deflation, and the United States has not really faced an outright threat of deflation since the financial crisis. But it is also an important consideration to get the plumbing of the money market system re-started after more than six years in stasis by moving to a positive federal funds rate.
The most important task for the Fed, in our view, is not to time the increase optimally, but to close the gap that exists between its view of the future (as represented by the much-discussed “dots” from its Summary of Economic Projections, or SEP) and the market’s view of the future as expressed by expectations for the yield curve and federal funds futures contracts. For many quarters, the market has anticipated much lower yields and interest rates in the coming years than the Fed has forecast. Fortunately, in their March update, members of the Open Market Committee nudged their forecasts lower. And the second quarter could show whether the market might need to push its estimates a bit higher.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.