- Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has called a snap election to take place October 22.
- Although Abe is favored to win, the reappointment of Bank of Japan (BoJ) Governor Haruhiko Kuroda may become a larger political issue.
- New leadership at the BoJ could cause a shift in policy that pushes global rates higher.
The Bank of Japan’s current policy encourages capital exports
Japan’s economy is doing well, and inflation remains short of the goal set by the Bank of Japan when it initiated a negative-interest-rate policy in 2016. So why would the BoJ change course?
The key issue is that BoJ Governor Kuroda’s term ends in April 2018. As long as Kuroda remains at the helm, the BoJ is likely to maintain an inflation target that is extraordinarily difficult to achieve. That means, in turn, that Japanese capital will leave the country in search of higher returns elsewhere. These Japanese capital exports have an influence abroad, helping to keep global interest rates low. Kuroda’s reappointment is crucial to the continuation of the BoJ’s negative-interest-rate policy, but his fate is tied to Prime Minister Abe’s political strength.
The challengers to Abe
Abe has called a snap parliamentary election this October 22, partly on the expectation that his leadership during the crisis with North Korea might offset a broader recent drop in his popularity. Abe’s Liberal Democrat Party (LDP) has experienced declining popularity since building a two-thirds super majority in parliament, but is facing off in the snap election against a weak opponent in the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). In an interesting development, the DPJ has entered into an electoral alliance with a new party, the Party of Hope, which is led by the popular Tokyo governor, Yuriko Koike. This alliance is campaigning on a couple of popular themes, such as canceling the sales tax hike scheduled to go into effect next year, and preventing a resumption of nuclear power that was shuttered after the Fukushima disaster.
The outcome could be like the U.K. snap election
We believe the central scenario for the Japan election is that Abe wins and goes on to reappoint Kuroda, and the current low-rate policy remains in effect for some time. However, there are two risk scenarios, as well. The first is very unlikely: The DPJ/Party of Hope alliance prevails and their leaders replace Kuroda with a new BoJ Governor to clear the way for a policy of higher interest rates. The second risk, still small, is a bit more likely: Abe experiences the fate of United Kingdom Prime Minister Theresa May, who earlier this year called a snap election, hoping to gain parliamentary seats, only to end up weakened. If Abe winds up needing to defend himself against a leadership challenge from within his party, then Kuroda’s reappointment could become a bargaining chip.
An LDP win could sustain Japan’s influence on keeping global rates low
With the LDP expected to prevail on rising approval ratings in recent months, the likelihood has perhaps risen a little that Japan will remain a source of capital exports, and the determination of the BoJ to keep Japanese interest rates low will continue to be an important influence on global rates. A different BoJ regime, installed by a different government, would affect global rates markets significantly.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.