Q2 2021 Putnam Muni Bond Funds Q&A
- Municipal technicals remained strong, and fundamentals improved on the heels of stronger economic growth and sizable fiscal stimulus.
- With valuations at relatively rich levels versus history, we would view any rate volatility or a market sell-off as a buying opportunity.
- With the easing of mobility restrictions and the roll out of the American Rescue Plan, we believe that U.S. economic growth will remain strong in the second half of 2021.
How did municipal bonds perform during the second quarter of 2021?The asset class delivered positive performance amid falling interest rates, strong growth, and solid supply/demand technicals.
After a sharp rise in the first quarter of 2021, rates fell during the second quarter. The yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note declined from 1.74% on March 31, 2021, to 1.45% on June 30, 2021. At the same time, vaccination progress led to a strong reopening in the United States, which gave way to inflation concerns and speculation that the Federal Reserve might begin scaling back its support for the U.S. economy. In May 2021, the Fed signaled it was considering tapering its $120 billion in monthly asset purchases. In June 2021, however, the Fed assumed a more hawkish tone. In their commentary, Fed officials projected two rate increases in 2023 if recent inflation persisted, which was sooner than expected. Although the Fed would continue its asset purchases near term, it indicated it was still considering tapering its asset purchases at some point.
Despite these concerns, municipal bonds gained ground due to several tailwinds. Credit fundamentals continued to improve due to a strong economic backdrop and the U.S. government’s unprecedented stimulus. The most recent aid package, the American Rescue Plan [ARP], which became law in March 2021, provided a windfall of $350 billion in direct aid to states and local governments. This support, coupled with the fact that state budgets have generally outperformed conservative forecasts, has raised the outlook for some of the largest issuers in the municipal bond market. Transit agencies, colleges and universities, and school districts are among the municipal sectors that were targeted for substantial aid in the ARP. Furthermore, local municipalities have benefited from a strong housing market and higher revenue raised by local property taxes.
Supply/demand technicals also factored into performance results. Total municipal issuance was $222 billion in the first half of 2021, which represented a 6% increase year over year through June 30, 2021. Taxable municipal issuance fell 4% year over year. [Source: The Bond Buyer.] This issuance was met with solid demand. Municipal bond fund inflows, a measure of investor demand, totaled $27 billion for the second quarter, with year-to-date inflows totaling nearly $60 billion through June 30, 2021. [Source: Lipper, a Refinitiv company.] This already positions 2021 as the third-highest municipal fund inflow year on record. We believe a potential increase in the corporate income tax rate is helping to spur additional municipal bond buying by taxable institutional investors, such as U.S. banks and insurance companies. Similarly, an increase in personal tax rates could stimulate further demand by individual investors.
For the three months ended June 30, 2021, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index returned 1.42%, outperforming the 0.00% return for U.S. Treasuries. Revenue bonds outperformed general obligation bonds. On the credit spectrum, higher-yielding, lower-rated municipal bonds outpaced higher-rated municipal bonds for the quarter.
How were the funds positioned in this environment?At quarter-end, the funds held an overweight exposure to investment-grade bonds rated A and BBB relative to the benchmark. The funds also held a slightly underweight exposure to lower-rated, high-yield bonds relative to their respective Lipper peer groups. From a sector- or industry-positioning perspective, we continued to favor higher education, retirement community, land development, and multifamily housing bonds relative to the funds’ Lipper peer groups. Duration positioning, a measure of the funds’ interest-rate sensitivity, was generally neutral relative to the level of their respective Lipper peer groups at period-end. Our yield-curve strategy was defined by an overweight position in bonds with maturities of 10 to 20 years relative to the Lipper peer groups at period-end. As part of this strategy, the funds generally held an underweight exposure to long maturity holdings compared with the benchmark.
The funds held an overweight exposure to revenue bonds compared with their Lipper peer groups. The funds’ exposure to state and local governments was limited to those with, in our view, diverse tax bases and the ability to enact broad revenue enhancements or expense cuts. As part of our strategy for state debt, the national municipal bond funds held an overweight exposure to Illinois relative to their Lipper peer groups. We believe Illinois’s financial profile continues to stabilize, and its flexibility and credit fundamentals have improved since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States.
We remain cautious on Puerto Rico due to what we believe are its seemingly fragile economy, weak demographic trends, poor-quality infrastructure, volatile political environment, and history of fiscal mismanagement. As such, the funds remained underweight in their exposure to uninsured Puerto Rico municipal debt compared with their Lipper peer groups. We continue to monitor the Commonwealth’s ongoing restructuring efforts for potential opportunities.
What is your outlook for the second half of 2021?If an infrastructure bill is passed, it would likely be a positive development for many municipal borrowers, particularly state and local governments, transit agencies, airports, and other entities that typically finance transportation infrastructure. Water/sewer and electric utilities are also likely to benefit from a broad infrastructure bill. In our view, federal grants for these projects would reduce the need for municipal borrowers to issue debt to cover these essential services. This could increase fiscal flexibility for these borrowers while avoiding higher tax burdens.
In addition, we believe that, with the easing of mobility restrictions and the ARP, U.S. economic growth will remain strong in the second half of 2021. At the same time, we believe the Fed remains committed to its twin goals of maximum employment and 2% sustained inflation. With these and other factors at play, we believe the lower tiers of the investment-grade market, particularly BBB-rated securities and some parts of the high-yield market, represent some of the best income and return opportunities. Despite pandemic challenges, year-to-date defaults remain low and within long-term ranges. Even with Covid-19 challenges in 2020, the default rate represented less than 0.25% of the overall municipal bond market, according to Municipal Market Analytics.
Municipal bonds were one of the best performing fixed-income asset classes during the first half of 2021. Given the rally, we are more cautious on valuations as the third quarter begins. Prior to the onset of the pandemic, credit spreads were at the tightest levels since 2008, reflecting improving creditworthiness. [Credit spreads reflect the difference in yield between higher- and lower-rated municipal bonds.] Spreads widened significantly during the 2020 sell-off, particularly for the lower-quality cohort, but have since tightened significantly. At this time, we believe spreads have fully recovered from the Covid-19-induced sell-off. This produced a municipal and U.S. Treasury yield relationship, referred to as the Municipal/Treasury [M/T] ratio, sitting at levels that we view as its richest point in over 20 years. [The M/T ratio measures the yield on AAA-rated municipal bonds relative to the yield on U.S. Treasuries of similar maturities and is one of our valuation tools in determining the relative richness or cheapness of municipals relative to U.S. Treasuries.]
The current uncertainties surrounding the path of inflation and the course of the pandemic could lead to increased interest-rate volatility. With valuations at relatively rich levels versus history, we would view any rate volatility or a market sell-off as a buying opportunity, especially in the lower-investment-grade and high-yield sectors of the municipal bond market.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.