Q3 2021 Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Q&A
- High-yield bank loans posted a moderate gain in the third quarter, aided by demand for higher-yielding securities offering low interest-rate sensitivity.
- Security selection and underweight allocations in the technology, services, and healthcare sectors detracted from relative performance this quarter.
- We have a generally positive outlook for the loan market's fundamental environment and supply-and-demand dynamics, but are more neutral toward valuation.
How did the fund perform for the three months ended September 30, 2021?The fund's class Y shares rose 0.72%, trailing the 1.11% return of the benchmark S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index.
What was the fund's investment environment like during the third quarter of 2021?Leveraged loans posted flat performance in July, hampered by a significant decline in longer-term U.S. Treasury yields, substantial new issuance, and increased stock market volatility. The market rebounded in August amid steady flows into retail funds, declining supply, and continued solid demand from CLOs. [CLO stands for "collateralized loan obligation." These vehicles bundle corporate loans and sell slices of the debt to institutional investors.]
The asset class rebounded in August. A strong July employment report — released on the first Friday in August — along with hawkish comments from U.S. Federal Reserve officials fueled speculation about when the Fed would announce the beginning of the end of its bond-buying program. These factors drove Treasury yields higher for most of the month, helping boost investor sentiment toward loans.
Loans had another solid gain in September, benefiting from an additional month of record CLO origination, steady retail fund inflows, and less new supply than expected. Treasury yields jumped higher in late September, continuing to redirect investor attention to floating-rate loans. While the Fed's signal to begin tapering later in the year was expected, investors were surprised when Fed Chair Powell indicated the board intended to conclude all of its bond buying around the middle of next year. Additionally, a fairly aggressive tone by Bank of England policymakers led to a sell-off of government bonds and a sharp rise in yields across Europe.
Relative to other asset classes, loans outpaced high-yield corporate bonds, investment-grade [IG] corporate credit, and the broad IG fixed-income market.
Within the fund's benchmark, every cohort generated a positive result with returns in a tight range. Utilities, consumer products, and energy were the top-performing groups versus the benchmark, with each gaining about 2%. Conversely, gaming, lodging & leisure, cable & satellite, and housing were the weakest performers, but each still managed to advance about 1%. From a credit-rating perspective, lower-quality loans delivered the best relative returns, signaling a comfort level with risk as investors sought higher yields.
What factors had the biggest influence on the fund's relative performance?Security selection and underweight allocations in the technology, services, and healthcare sectors hampered performance versus the benchmark.
What is the team's outlook for the bank loan market over the coming months?We have a positive outlook for loan market fundamentals and the overall supply-and-demand backdrop. Our view on valuation is more neutral, given the relative tightness of yield spreads in the market as of quarter-end. That said, we think loan spreads are somewhat more attractive than high-yield bond spreads. [Spreads are the yield advantage loans and credit-sensitive bonds offer over comparable-maturity U.S. Treasuries.]
Our optimism is driven by the sizable percentage of Americans who have received Covid-19 vaccines, along with continued government stimulus. As of September 30, U.S. cases of, and hospitalizations from, Covid continued to steadily decline, as the country seems to be moving past a July surge caused by the highly transmissible Delta variant.
Within this environment, we remain focused on the health of loan issuers' balance sheets and liquidity metrics, with an eye toward default risk or a credit-rating downgrade.
Expectations for defaults have meaningfully improved this year, given the liquidity in the market. In our view, many troubled issuers have been given the lifeline they need to continue operating. Including distressed exchanges, the U.S. leveraged loan default rate ended the period at 0.89%, down substantially from 4.6% at the end of last September. The departure of large default/ distressed totals from September 2020 helped lower the rolling 12-month default rate calculation. We think the default rate could stay below its long-term average of 3% during the remainder of 2021 and into 2022.
As for supply/demand dynamics, new issuance of loans totaled $655.5 billion on a year-to-date [YTD] basis through September, more than double the amount issued during the same period last year. About 57% of this year's new issuance has been used to refinance existing debt. On the demand side, loan funds [mutual funds and exchange-traded funds] posted inflows of $34.9 billion for the YTD period compared with outflows of $26.3 billion during the first nine months of 2020.
As for loan demand from CLOs, on a YTD basis through September, CLO volume equaled $309.5 billion compared with $86.5 billion for the same period in 2020. CLOs now account for roughly two thirds of the total assets in the loan market, while retail funds represent only about 10%.
Despite a substantial increase in loan supply, we think the market's technical environment is favorable. In addition to demand from CLOs, we have seen strong demand from retail investors, who are seeking assets with relatively low interest-rate sensitivity that provide higher yields compared with other fixed income alternatives.
From a valuation standpoint, the average spread of the fund's benchmark tightened to 4.1 percentage points over U.S. Treasuries as of period-end, below the long-term average of about 6 percentage points. The benchmark's yield was 4.77% as of September 30, significantly below its 11-year average of 7.24%. Despite tighter spreads and lower yields, we think the market's income level remains comparatively attractive versus much lower global yields.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.