Q1 2022 Putnam Muni Bond Funds Q&A
- Persistently high inflation and rising interest rates created headwinds and negative results for the asset class during the quarter.
- Our strategies have positioned the funds with a slightly defensive bias, but not completely risk-off.
- We believe the credit outlook is currently the most favorable factor supporting the asset class.
How did municipal bonds perform during the first quarter of 2022?Municipal bonds encountered headwinds due to fears that persistently high inflation might prompt the Federal Reserve to pare back pro-growth monetary policies faster than expected. Inflation concerns were stoked by supply chain disruptions, rising labor costs, and higher commodity prices. Geopolitical and economic uncertainties surrounding Russia's invasion of Ukraine in late February also unnerved investors.
The Fed faces the difficult task of tempering inflation without slowing economic growth or causing unemployment to rise. In January 2022, the Fed indicated it was on track to start a series of rate hikes in March 2022 and end its bond-buying stimulus program. The war in Ukraine and ensuing sanctions on Russia elevated commodity prices. This further complicated the Fed's balancing act and shifted expectations for the number and degree of interest-rate hikes higher. At its final meeting for the quarter in March, Fed policymakers raised their benchmark rate by a quarter percentage point and signaled their intent to take further measures to curb the highest inflation in 40 years. The markets subsequently began pricing in a higher probability that the Fed would raise interest rates by a half percentage point at one or more of its 2022 meetings.
These factors led to significant outflows from municipal bond funds, resulting in increasingly difficult market technicals. For the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index return was –6.23%.
How were the funds positioned at the end of the first quarter?Our strategies have positioned the funds with a slightly defensive bias, but not completely risk-off. At quarter-end, the funds held an overweight exposure to bonds rated A and BBB relative to the benchmark. From a sector- or industry-positioning perspective, we favored continuing-care retirement community, higher education, and charter school bonds relative to the funds' Lipper peer groups. Duration positioning, a measure of the funds' interest-rate sensitivity, was generally neutral relative to the level of their Lipper peer groups at period-end.
Regarding our strategy for state debt, the funds held an overweight exposure to Illinois relative to their Lipper peer groups. We believe Illinois's financial profile continues to stabilize, and its flexibility and credit fundamentals have improved since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States.
We remain cautious about investing in bonds issued by Puerto Rico due to what we believe are its seemingly fragile economy, weak demographic trends, poor-quality infrastructure, volatile political environment, and history of fiscal mismanagement. As such, the funds remained underweight in their exposure to uninsured Puerto Rico municipal debt relative to their Lipper peer groups. We continue to monitor Puerto Rico's ongoing restructuring efforts for potential opportunities.
What is your current assessment of the health of the municipal bond market?Municipal bonds had a difficult start to 2022 as positive seasonal factors waned, fund flows turned negative, and the market adjusted to a quicker pace of policy normalization. However, municipal credit fundamentals remain strong, in our view. Unprecedented fiscal support, tax revenue outperformance, and strong economic growth expectations have put most state and local governments in the best fiscal shape for more than a decade. State and local tax collections also were up 13.6% in 2021 compared with 2020. Finally, municipal defaults are in line with long-term averages and remain isolated to the lowest-rated cohorts. As such, we believe the credit outlook is currently the most favorable factor supporting the asset class.
What is your outlook as we enter the second quarter of 2022?Higher-than-expected inflation and strong labor reports during the first quarter have seemingly cemented the Fed's pivot to a more hawkish stance. The market has quickly repriced to reflect a faster path of policy normalization. In our view, the Fed is likely to continue the path of policy normalization. This process could contribute to heightened market volatility but also present investors with attractive opportunities.
We expect pandemic-related supply chain pressures will begin to ease and U.S. economic activity will slow in the second half of 2022. We think the combination could contribute to slower growth and lower inflation, which could lead to a slower pace of policy normalization than is currently priced in.
In our view, the technical environment is likely to remain challenged, as investors respond to tightening monetary policy. The volatility-induced outflow cycle is no longer a potential risk but a current reality. Municipal bond funds saw $23 billion in outflows during the first quarter. However, valuations at this level are more attractive, and future returns look more promising for longer-term investors, in our opinion.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.