The Federal Reserve is considering a new tool to manage interest rates in an improving economy, and the policy could result in broader control in the monetary system of the United States.
While acknowledging that the Fed funds rate has been an effective tool for monetary policy, the Fed may have a desire to switch to a different regime, one that would involve the Fed maintaining a permanent balance sheet.
Maybe the balance sheet is not $4.5 trillion [see graph], but maybe it would be $2 trillion or $3 trillion. With that balance sheet, they would conduct open market operations, as they do today. But with their large portfolio, they would try to set a floor rate for interest rates in the short end of the yield curve. This floor rate would, in turn, via different channels in the markets, such as money market funds or bank deposits, work to set monetary policy.
Quantitative easing: A closer look
A series of bond purchase programs have expanded the Fed’s balance sheet while holding down interest rates.
From our perspective, there’s a reasonable chance that this [approach] is going to be highly successful.
The Fed has been testing a facility, a reverse repurchase facility, that allows them to perform open market operations with the system. They want to see how functional this tool might be, whether they can make the liquidity in the system move with their large balance sheet.
To date, the tests have been fairly successful. Although limited in size, the tests have gone smoothly.
If you look through Fed research, and you listen to the Fed talking points, they do intend to hold a fairly large balance sheet for the foreseeable future, and their monetary operations will be conducted less through the Fed funds channel, and more through their open market operations with the market. The open market operations would be conducted through a reverse repurchase system that they establish: The Fed would sell assets to the private sector and simultaneously buy them back at a future date. The transaction temporarily removes cash from the system.
The Fed envisions this capability as its new Fed funds tool. The difference between the Fed funds and this new tool is that the Fed funds can only operate through the bank channel. With the new tool, the Fed can operate through money market mutual funds or operate through the GSEs (government-sponsored enterprises), or operate through the banks. The Fed could get broader control over the entire system.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.