- As the virus evolved from an emerging threat to a global crisis, we implemented a three-step approach to managing our small-cap growth portfolio.
- We analyzed the liquidity and debt levels of our holdings to determine which companies could weather this severe shock.
- We conducted deeper analysis to determine which companies we believed might be structurally weaker in a year or two as a result of the pandemic.
- We continue to seek companies that will be structurally stronger as a result of the pandemic.
As investors, we believe the negative shock of the COVID-19 pandemic will reveal the strengths and weaknesses of many business models. At the same time, it should also accelerate the pace of disruptive change that many small companies help to promote.
“We have already seen signs of resilience, and in some cases recovery, since the market bottom and the height of the business shutdowns.”
Our three-step approach to managing through volatility
As the virus evolved from an emerging threat to a global crisis, we implemented a three-step approach to managing our small-cap growth portfolio. Steps one and two were designed to seek downside protection for the portfolio, while the third step was aimed at finding growth opportunities. First, we analyzed the liquidity and debt levels of our holdings to determine which companies we believed could weather this severe shock. Our investment approach going into the crisis was beneficial, as we were already focused on businesses with strong margins, strong returns, and cash-generating ability. We did not find many companies in our portfolio with debt levels that were high enough to hamper future growth prospects, in our view.Detecting longer-term structural weakness
Our second step was to conduct deeper analysis to determine which companies might be structurally weaker in a year or two as a result of the pandemic. It is worth noting that far fewer companies declare bankruptcy than is commonly believed. However, future returns on capital and growth prospects can be diminished if liquidity and debt levels force a company to cut costs too deeply. For example, if an airline cannot fly its planes, which were acquired through loans, the business faces serious challenges. Many stocks in the travel and leisure industries have been punished severely. However, in many cases, the long-term impact is not obvious. Will a regional casino operator, for example, be able to successfully conduct business with fewer patrons? If “yes,” then this presents a compelling opportunity. Our top priority is determining the answers to questions such as this as we manage our portfolio.“Future returns on capital and growth prospects can be diminished if liquidity and debt levels force a company to cut costs too deeply.”
Seeking growth drivers
Step three in our process is finding companies that we expect will be structurally stronger as a result of the pandemic. While the nature of every crisis is different, they do have one thing in common. Crises tend to accelerate the pace of change, often out of necessity. In our fundamental research, we always consider disruptive change, as it is often the force that enables small companies to compete against their larger peers. We are already finding that the Covid-19 pandemic has enhanced the growth potential of many small companies, and we are seeking to add them to our portfolio.“Disruptive change is often the force that enables small companies to compete against their larger peers.”
Industries that may benefit from disruptive change
Among the beneficiaries, in our view, are companies that specialize in remotely connecting patients and health-care professionals. We believe the adoption rate of telemedicine has advanced by several years as a result of the sudden COVID-19 lockdown and the need for social distancing.Changes brought on by the pandemic should also benefit businesses with cloud-based software offerings. Examples include companies that provide online learning services and those that enable financial institutions to offer mobile banking services.
322214
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.
