Alternative investments have been among the fastest growing areas of the investment industry over the past decade. However, the sector's nomenclature still reflects its hedge fund lineage, with opaque names such as "long/short" more prevalent than easy-to-grasp terms such as "growth."
The viewpoint of investors
The world of alternative investments may seem more exotic and difficult to navigate in part because of the terminology. Alternatives can offer benefits to all kinds of investors who want to diversify their portfolios for specific purposes, such as to reduce volatility. It's important to have a better roadmap.
Four important groups
As part of our recent research comparing the performance of different types of alternative investment strategies over multiple economic scenarios of the past 20 years, we endeavored to classify groups of alternative strategies and develop more descriptive labels for them. We mapped strategies into categories to provide a goal-based approach to understand the types of roles they may play in a portfolio, as a way for investors to better understand the possible uses for each one.
We see four primary objectives for alternatives.
• Return Enhancer Seeks to outperform traditional equity, fixed-income, or mixed-asset strategies.
• Inflation Hedge Seeks to preserve capital and purchasing power over time and especially in periods of increased inflation, when traditional financial assets may lose purchasing power.
• Risk Reducer/Volatility Dampener Seeks to pursue efficient return streams with an emphasis on reducing the risk of market drawdowns as well as long-term volatility.
• Zero Beta/Zero Correlation Seeks to provide return that is completely independent from traditional asset classes.
Aligning objectives with strategies
After focusing our attention on better describing these four potential benefits that alternatives can offer to portfolios, we looked at the variety of strategies that could fit these objectives.
We found that, in a few cases, different alternative strategies could fall under the same objective. For example, a multi-strategy approach and a global macro approach both offer ways to reduce risk or dampen volatility. Similarly, managed futures, market neutral, and convertible arbitrage strategies try, in different ways, to reduce portfolio beta and market correlation.
We then identified indexes that could be used as proxies to analyze the performance of alternative objectives over time.
Viewing alternatives through the prism of what they can actually do for investors helps to dispel some of their complexity, we believe. The four objectives that we have identified, like the efforts of rating agencies such as Morningstar and Lipper to define categories for comparative purposes, help to make the world of alternatives a little easier to navigate.
The objectives also provide the framework for our research paper for financial professionals, Alternatives in Action, which studies the performance of alternatives in different economic scenarios of the past 20 years.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.