- We view the U.S. ban on Huawei as linked directly to the escalating trade war with China
- Huawei is among the largest global purchasers of semiconductors, and the ban is likely to be highly disruptive to the technology industry
- Risks include retaliation from policy makers in China and a slowdown in the global rollout of 5G network technology
Last week, the U.S. Commerce Department announced that it would add China-based telecom and smartphone giant Huawei and its subsidiaries to a U.S. “entity list.” This prevents Huawei from buying U.S. technology without prior approval. While this was publicly justified under the guise of national security, we view the move as linked directly to the escalating trade war with China. It suggests that if a trade conflict agreement is eventually reached, we could see the ban partially or entirely lifted. Chinese telecom company ZTE offers precedent here. A similar ban was imposed on ZTE in 2018, but was later lifted when the U.S. government negotiated a settlement with ZTE and the Chinese government that included a penalty payment and compliance monitoring.
In the meantime, the export ban is likely to be highly disruptive to the technology industry in both China and the United States. Huawei is the world’s largest vendor of networking equipment and the second-largest smartphone manufacturer. However, Huawei still relies on U.S. technology for products it is unable to design and build domestically — primarily semiconductors. In fact, our data suggests that Huawei is the fifth-largest global purchaser of semiconductors and accounts for more than 3% of total annual demand, primarily purchased from U.S.-based companies. This explains why we have seen several U.S. semiconductor companies lower their revenue outlooks as they confirm their compliance with the ban.
“We have seen several U.S. semiconductor companies lower their revenue outlooks as they confirm their compliance with the ban.”
The potential ramifications depend on numerous factors that are impossible to judge (we try to avoid predicting President Trump’s tweets). One ramification we expect is that the ban will drive the Chinese government to increase its support of domestic semiconductor and software companies in order to reduce their reliance on U.S. technology. In the United States, we have already started to see evidence that the ban will be a modest headwind to many Huawei suppliers.
Potential risks and implications
- Policy makers in China, who have so far been fairly muted, could take retaliatory measures
- A prolonged export ban could bring a slowdown in the global rollout of 5G network technology
- If Huawei remains crippled by the ban, its smartphone and telecom equipment peers, mainly in Europe and Asia, will have the opportunity to gain market share
- Further escalation of the conflict could lead to a broader export ban for Chinese companies and/or embargo not only from the United States, but also from U.S. allies
We continue to track the developments closely and expect pressure to remain on financial markets, and the technology sector in particular, until there is increased visibility to a negotiated settlement.
Huawei is not a publicly traded company and is not a holding in any Putnam funds.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.