Fixed income markets are likely to be volatile given macro-driven risks and the higher cost of borrowing.
- The Federal Reserve will move cautiously in the coming months, we believe.
- After the bank failures in Q1, only time will tell whether the policy actions taken to minimize contagion will be sufficient to restore confidence.
- We continue to position portfolios with reduced risk, including lower spread duration across credit sectors.
Banking stress tightens financial conditions
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and later of Signature Bank (SBNY), along with the cryptocurrency-focused Silvergate Bank, brought financial stability concerns to the forefront in the first quarter. The Fed, the Treasury, and the FDIC jointly acted to minimize further contagion from the failed banks to other financial institutions or markets, but they avoided providing full-spectrum guarantees or support.
The FDIC took over SVB and SBNY and said it will fully protect all depositors, which were mostly large and, hence, uninsured. This raised the expectation that the FDIC will do the same if another bank fails but fell short of providing a blanket deposit guarantee some market participants were looking for. The FDIC insured deposit limit stayed at $250,000, which is determined by Congress.
Congress is reluctant
There is no appetite in Congress to lift the limit on deposit guarantees at this point, especially considering the unresolved debt ceiling issue. The policymakers prefer to avoid extensive guarantees unless the situation deteriorates materially, as the creative approach taken trying to settle the First Republic Bank stress ($30 billion deposit by large banks) also shows. Policymakers know deep inside that their large-scale policy support contributed to today's high inflation.
Once the confidence in banking is shaken, it might be hard to restore it quickly and fully. Time will tell if the policy actions will be sufficient to raise confidence in the market.
Figure 1. U.S. Treasury rates rallied during the period
Source: U.S. Treasury Department. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Credit channels may be pinched
The importance of the bank credit channel varies across sectors. The banking sector plays a much bigger role in consumer loans and commercial real estate, but bank size also matters. Small banks have been the dominant players in commercial real estate (CRE). They have provided about 67% of bank lending to CREs, including multifamily lending. Small banks' consumer loan books make a smaller share — a little less than 30% — of total consumer lending.
Because the role of capital markets in non-residential consumer lending is relatively small by comparison, any stress in the banking sector, whether in large or small banks, can damage the consumer credit channel notably. Small banks have also gained market share in residential real estate for the last 10 years.
Meanwhile, CRE loan growth among small banks has been strong in recent years, although with tightened lending standards for CRE borrowers. On the other hand, CRE loan growth has been slowing at large banks. Bank lending standards to CRE borrowers are likely to be further tightened or, at least, stay tight for longer. This can create a serious problem for the CRE market, some segments of which had already been struggling with the structural and pandemic-induced changes.
Commercial real estate may see costs rise
Even if funding is available, the cost of debt may rise. The growing concern is that this will happen at a time when CRE refinancing needs are high. About $1.1 trillion of CRE loans are expected to mature in 2023 and 2024. Some CRE borrowers will naturally come to the capital markets and will likely face higher interest costs. In a relatively less-liquid market, this can raise the cost of borrowing for all types of CMBS borrowers. Lack of and/or costly funding can lead to an increase in defaults and restructurings in an economy with a deteriorating outlook.
Recession odds rise
Consumer spending is holding up, and the labor market is tight, but some deterioration in leading indicators has caused anxiety. While this deterioration may not be enough to crack the labor market, the probability of a recession has risen. If the activity stabilizes at a low level, the soft-landing discussion is likely to make a comeback.
This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as research or investment advice regarding any strategy or security in particular.
This material is prepared for use by institutional investors and investment professionals and is provided for limited purposes. This material is a general communication being provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not designed to be investment advice or a recommendation of any specific investment product, strategy, or decision, and is not intended to suggest taking or refraining from any course of action. The opinions expressed in this material represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the material. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this material are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
This material or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold, or redistributed in whole or in part without the express written consent of Putnam Investments. The information provided relates to Putnam Investments and its affiliates, which include The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC and Putnam Investments Limited®.